|
463p PERSEPHONE BOOKS ISBN 190315555x
By the time Rachel Ferguson wrote Alas, Poor
Lady, Persephone Book No. 65, in 1937 it
was possible to look back with horror and disbelief
at what had happened to the daughters of extravagantly
large Victorian families, victims of ‘parental
incompetence’ (p107), who did not manage,
through ineptitude or plainness or bad luck, to
catch a husband.
This novel is in the Lytton Strachey tradition
of furious anger with those who had gone before.
There were thousands of women who had been condemned
to become distressed gentlefolk, dependent for
their livelihood (unless they had been fortunate
enough to inherit wealth) to seek work as governesses
and companions, often in families that did not
treat them well. When they could not find work
they were reduced to virtual penury. In the opening,
1936, chapter the question is asked: ‘But
– how does it happen? How does it happen?’
The finger of blame in Alas, Poor Lady is
cast less at the men (since the system favoured
them in all respects why would they seek to change
it?) but at the matriarch who is too lazy, too
unthinking to want to change things for her numerous
daughters. It is Mrs Scrimgeour in her large house
in Kensington who is the real culprit, being selfish,
evasive and lacking in any concern for her daughters
beyond that of trying to make sure they fulfil
society’s expectations of them. She fails
to train them to be attractive to men or to find
ways of occupying themselves; the most important
thing, her daughters wearily accept, is that ‘a
family of your own, one saw, saved your face’
(p117).
As Ruth Adam writes in her section headed ‘The
Superfluous Woman’ in A
Woman’s Place (Persephone Book
No. 20, which provides the historical background
to many of the issues explored in Persephone novels):
‘On the whole the man’s world which
came to an end with the Great War was a pleasant
enough one for wives – at least compared
with any previous period. But it was a very harsh
world indeed in which to be a spinster. Spinsters
had to face the fact that they were a nuisance
to everybody, because there was no provision for
them to be independent of a man’s help,
in an economy set up by males for males.’
At the time of the 1911 census, when Grace Scrimgeour
is 40, 30% of women were unmarried; like other
Persephone novels such as EM Delafield’s
Consequences
(1919), and Lettice Cooper’s
The New House (1936), Persephone
Books Nos. 13 and 47, Alas, Poor Lady
focuses on society’s failure to provide
for this third, or to consider these spinsters
anything but an embarrassment. ‘The fear
of tomorrow and all the tomorrows filled her.
The time there was! Whereas men filled it to the
brim, a woman’s life was one of eternal
waiting, to be taken out, called on, danced with
or proposed to. How had it originated, this division
of opportunity?’
As Winifred Holtby wrote at the end of the 1930s,
‘the once traditional contempt of the spinster
was a thing of the past’ so that by then
Rachel Ferguson’s novel had become an indictment
of the past rather than a polemic about continuing
injustices. Alas, Poor Lady, which ends
in 1936, traces the life of Grace Scrimgeour and
her family over the decades from 1870 onwards:
we watch what happens to her in relation to her
soldier brother Charlie and her sisters (Gertie,
Georgie, Aggie, Arabella, Mary, Queenie...). Imprisoned
at home while some of her sisters escape into
marriage, she fills her days with trivia such
as tapestry: the Victorian spinster, after all,
sewed rather than spun (‘Aggie was staring
out of the window, Queenie working as if for a
wager at a tapestry runner’ – hence
our endpaper).
But eventually, because of her mother’s
financial improvidence, Grace has to become a
governess; but at last finds some limited independence
and happiness.
Alas, Poor Lady is Rachel Ferguson’s
best and most readable book (she is also the
author
of The Brontes went to Woolworths; however, we
consider this to be the stronger novel). ‘Grace
was thirty. A despairing knowledge that only
frantic absorption
in house and friends could temporarily stifle...
[Her niece] had had a baby, years ago... Once,
forgetful, she had told her mother of the baby’s
charm and cried, “I wish she was mine!”
and Mrs Scrimgeour had been shocked. “You
had better not go about saying that, Grace.”
You were a failure if you didn’t have a
baby, but a disgrace if you wanted one, and said
so.’
Endpapers taken from an early
twentieth-century bargello tapestry in a private collection.
|